TrickyMay 07, 2026Solved

Clues by Sam May 07, 2026 Answer – Full Solution Explained

A1

💂‍♂️

Alex

guard

B1

👩‍🌾

Betty

farmer

C1

👩‍🔧

Celia

mech

D1

👮‍♂️

Eric

cop

A2

💂‍♂️

Gus

guard

B2

👷‍♀️

Helen

builder

C2

👨‍🎨

Ike

painter

D2

👨‍🌾

Kumar

farmer

A3

👩‍✈️

Laura

pilot

B3

👩‍🏫

Mary

teacher

C3

👨‍🎨

Nick

painter

D3

👩‍✈️

Petra

pilot

A4

👮‍♀️

Quita

cop

B4

👨‍✈️

Steve

pilot

C4

👩‍🎨

Tina

painter

D4

👷‍♂️

Umar

builder

A5

👩‍🔬

Vera

scientist

B5

👨‍🔧

Wally

mech

C5

👩‍🏫

Xia

teacher

D5

👨‍🔧

Zach

mech

Final Board State

This puzzle is fully solved.

All characters have been identified as innocent or criminal based on today's clues.

Final Result
Innocent 15Criminal 5Unknown 0

See how each clue leads to the final result

Just the answer

Skip the reasoning — 5 criminals.

Full walkthrough · Thursday May 07, 2026

Clues by Sam answer for May 07, 2026 — a Tricky solved in 15 steps

Today's Clues by Sam puzzle is rated Tricky and resolves with 5 criminals on a 20-cell, 4-column × 5-row grid. The criminals are Betty (B1), Celia (C1), Helen (B2), Laura (A3) and Petra (D3); the remaining 15 suspects are innocent.

The deduction chain, in plain English

01.A2 · Gus INNOCENT, D2 · Kumar INNOCENT

Umar’s clue says exactly 2 corner people have an innocent directly below them. There must be 2 more such cases to satisfy that clue, and the only direct-below people still relevant to this clue are Gus and Kumar. So those two have to supply the needed innocent-below cases. That makes Gus and Kumar innocent.

02.A4 · Quita INNOCENT, A5 · Vera INNOCENT

Gus says exactly 2 people below him have an innocent directly below them. Two such cases are still needed, and the only remaining direct-below pair that can supply them is Quita and Vera. So both of those positions have to be innocent for Gus's clue to be satisfied. That makes Quita and Vera innocent.

03.B2 · Helen CRIMINAL

Mary, Nick, and Petra are the three people to the right of Laura, and that group contains exactly 2 innocents. Among Ike's neighbors who are not in row 1, there must be exactly 3 innocents: Kumar plus those same three people to the right of Laura, with Helen as the only additional person in that larger group. Since Mary, Nick, and Petra already account for the 2 innocents allowed there, adding Kumar makes the full non-row-1 neighbor group's 3 innocents completely used up. That leaves no innocent place for Helen, so Helen must be criminal.

04.B1 · Betty CRIMINAL

Helen’s clue says Betty is one of the exactly 2 criminals in row 1. That directly identifies Betty’s status from the clue itself. So Betty must be criminal.

05.A1 · Alex INNOCENT

Ike’s row 1 neighbors are Betty, Celia, and Eric, and that group contains exactly 2 criminals. Row 1 as a whole also contains exactly 2 criminals: Alex, Betty, Celia, and Eric. Since the smaller group inside row 1 already accounts for both criminals allowed in the whole row, the only row 1 person outside that group, Alex, cannot be a criminal. So Alex must be innocent.

06.C3 · Nick INNOCENT

Alex says all innocents in row 3 are connected, so the innocents there have to form one single block. Quita says exactly two of the people to the right of Laura are innocents, so among Mary, Nick, and Petra there must be exactly two innocents. The only connected innocent blocks in row 3 that fit that are Mary and Nick, Laura-Mary-Nick, or Nick and Petra. Every one of those includes Nick, so Nick must be innocent.

07.C2 · Ike INNOCENT

Nick’s clue says Ike is one of Helen’s 5 innocent neighbors. That directly identifies Ike as an innocent neighbor of Helen. So Ike must be innocent.

08.A3 · Laura CRIMINAL

Nick’s clue says Helen has exactly 5 innocent neighbors. Among Helen’s neighbors, Alex, Gus, Ike, and Nick are already innocent, so there is room for exactly one more innocent among Celia, Laura, and Mary. Alex’s clue says all innocents in row 3 are connected, and in row 3 the only known innocent is Nick. That means the extra innocent in Helen’s neighboring part of row 3 must be Mary, not Laura, because Laura and Nick would not give a connected group of innocents in that row. So Laura must be criminal.

09.B4 · Steve INNOCENT, C4 · Tina INNOCENT

Nick’s clue says Nick has more innocent neighbors than Helen. Right now Nick’s neighbors have 3 known innocents, while Helen’s neighbors have 4 known innocents, so the remaining unknown people tied to these clues have to make Nick’s side finish higher than Helen’s. If Steve and Tina were both criminals, then only Celia, Mary, and Petra would be left to supply the needed innocents for these clue facts. That cannot satisfy everything at once, so Steve and Tina cannot both have the opposite identity. So Steve and Tina must be innocent.

10.B5 · Wally INNOCENT

Ike's row 1 neighbors are Betty, Celia, and Eric, and exactly 2 of them are criminals. The edge cells that are not Umar's neighbors also must contain exactly 3 criminals, and that larger group is Alex, Betty, Celia, Eric, Gus, Kumar, Laura, Quita, Umar, Vera, and Wally. Within that larger group, Betty and Laura are already known criminals, so it needs exactly one more criminal. But among Betty, Celia, and Eric, exactly two are criminals, and since Betty is one of them, that means exactly one of Celia or Eric is also a criminal. So the needed third criminal in the larger group is already accounted for by Betty together with one of Celia or Eric, leaving no room for Wally to be a criminal. So Wally must be innocent.

11.C5 · Xia INNOCENT

Below Eric there must be exactly 3 innocents, and Kumar and Umar already account for 2 of them. So among the two unknown people below Eric, Petra and Zach, exactly 1 is innocent. Among the edge criminals, exactly 1 is Umar's neighbor, so within Umar's edge-cell neighbors Petra, Xia, and Zach, there must be exactly 2 innocents. Since Petra and Zach together provide only 1 innocent, the remaining person in that group has to provide the other one. That remaining person is Xia, so Xia must be innocent.

12.C1 · Celia CRIMINAL, D1 · Eric INNOCENT

Tina’s clue says the edge has exactly four criminals, and exactly one of those edge criminals is Umar’s neighbor. Xia’s clue says exactly one innocent in column C has a criminal directly to the right, and the known innocents in column C are Ike, Nick, Tina, and Xia. If Celia were innocent and Eric were criminal, then D3 Petra and D5 Zach would have to make both clues true at the same time, but they cannot. That means Celia and Eric cannot have those opposite identities. So Celia must be criminal and Eric must be innocent.

13.B3 · Mary INNOCENT

Nick’s clue says Ike is one of Helen’s exactly 5 innocent neighbors. Among Helen’s neighbors, Alex, Gus, Ike, and Nick are already innocent, while Betty, Celia, and Laura are criminal, and Mary is the only neighbor there not yet identified. If Mary were criminal, Helen would have only 4 innocent neighbors, not 5. So Mary must be innocent.

14.D3 · Petra CRIMINAL

Quita’s clue says the people to the right of Laura contain exactly 2 innocents. That group already has 2 known innocents, Mary and Nick. The only person there whose identity is not yet known is Petra, so Petra cannot also be innocent without making more than 2 innocents to Laura’s right. So Petra must be criminal.

15.D5 · Zach INNOCENT

Tina's clue says there are exactly 4 criminals on the edge, and exactly 1 of those edge criminals is Umar's neighbor. Among the edge people who are Umar's neighbors, Petra is already a known criminal, while Xia is innocent and Zach is the only unknown. That means the one criminal allowed in that shared group is already Petra, so Zach cannot also be a criminal. So Zach is innocent.

More answers

Full archive →